The Challenge
Quarterly access reviews are tedious. Managers rubber-stamp approvals without context, and security teams spend days compiling reports. Real risks get buried in volume.
The AI Desk Solution
AI Desk analyzes access patterns and provides smart recommendations for each review decision.
The Workflow
Step 1: Review Trigger
Trigger: Quarterly access review cycle
Sources: Okta, AWS IAM, usage logs
Step 2: Pattern Analysis
- Usage frequency
- Role alignment
- Anomaly detection
Step 3: Smart Review
š Access Review: Q2 2026
REVIEW SCOPE
āāā Users: 450
āāā Applications: 34
āāā Roles: 128
āāā Recommendations generated: 450
SUMMARY BY RECOMMENDATION
āāā ā Approve (no action): 380 (84%)
āāā ā ļø Review recommended: 52 (12%)
āāā š“ Revoke recommended: 18 (4%)
āāā Manager decisions needed: 70
HIGH PRIORITY REVOCATIONS
User: jordan.lee@company.com
āāā Application: AWS Console (Admin)
āāā Last used: 89 days ago
āāā Role change: Moved to Marketing
āāā Recommendation: š“ Revoke
āāā Risk: High-privilege unused access
User: alex.chen@company.com
āāā Application: Salesforce (Admin)
āāā Last used: 45 days ago
āāā Note: On extended leave
āāā Recommendation: ā ļø Suspend
āāā Risk: Account dormant
REVIEW BY MANAGER
Sarah Kim (12 reports)
āāā Auto-approved: 8
āāā Needs decision: 4
āāā [Start review]
Jamie Chen (8 reports)
āāā Auto-approved: 6
āāā Needs decision: 2
āāā [Start review]
COMPLIANCE STATUS
āāā Reviews completed: 0/450
āāā Deadline: May 1, 2026
āāā Days remaining: 12
Value Proposition
- Time Saved: 8 hours per cycle
- Smarter Decisions: Usage-based recommendations
- Better Security: Real risks surfaced
Part of the 100 Days 100 Usecases campaign. View all usecases